翻訳と辞書 ・ Webster, Ontario ・ Webster, Pennsylvania ・ Webster, Placer County, California ・ Webster, San Diego ・ Webster, South Dakota ・ Webster, Texas ・ Webster, Vernon County, Wisconsin ・ Webster, Virginia ・ Webster, West Virginia ・ Webster, Wisconsin ・ Webster-Chicago ・ Webster-Lane House ・ Websterite ・ Websterville, Vermont ・ Webster–Ashburton Treaty ・ Webster–Hayne debate ・ Webstock ・ WEBT ・ WEBT (disambiguation) ・ WebTAG ・ Webtag (software) ・ WebTone Technologies ・ Webtoon ・ Webtoon Hero Toondra Show ・ WebTrain ・ Webtrees ・ Webtrekk ・ Webtrends ・ Webtretho ・ Webu Sayadaw
|
|
Webster–Hayne debate : ウィキペディア英語版 | Webster–Hayne debate The Webster–Hayne debate was a famous debate in the United States between Senator Daniel Webster of Massachusetts and Senator Robert Y. Hayne of South Carolina that took place on January 19–27, 1830 on the topic of protectionist tariffs. The heated speeches between Webster and Hayne themselves were unplanned, and stemmed from debate over a resolution by Connecticut Senator Samuel A. Foot calling for the temporary suspension of further land surveying until land already on the market was sold (this would effectively stop the introduction of new lands onto the market). Webster's "Second Reply to Hayne" was generally regarded as "the most eloquent speech ever delivered in Congress."〔Allan Nevins, ''Ordeal of the Union" (1947) 1:288〕 Webster's description of the U.S. government as "made for the people, made by the people, and answerable to the people," was later paraphrased by Abraham Lincoln in the Gettysburg Address in the words "government of the people, by the people, for the people." (詳細はDaniel Webster's "Second Reply" to South Carolina Senator Robert Y. Hayne has long been thought of as a great oratorical celebration of American nationalism in a period of sectional strife. The 1830 Webster–Hayne debate centered around the South Carolina nullification crisis of the late 1820s, but historians have largely ignored the sectional interests underpinning Webster's argument on behalf of Unionism and a transcendent nationalism. In many respects, his speech betrays the mentality of Massachusetts conservatives seeking to regain national leadership and advance their particular ideas about the nation. Webster realized that if the social, political, and economic elite of Massachusetts and the Northeast were to once again lay claim to national leadership, he had to justify New England's previous history of sectionalism within a framework of nationalistic progression. Though Webster made an impassioned argument, the political, social, and economic traditions of New England informed his ideas about the threatened nation. Even more pointedly, his speech reflected a decade of arguments from other Massachusetts conservatives who argued against supposed threats to New England's social order.〔Sheidley, Harlow W. "The Wester-Hayne Debate: Recasting New England's Sectionalism" ''New England Quarterly'' 1995 67(1): 5-29. Issn: 0028-4866 Fulltext in Jstor〕
抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)』 ■ウィキペディアで「Webster–Hayne debate」の詳細全文を読む
スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース |
Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.
|
|